Theologians prepare for E.T.

Square peg, round hole...

It is in the nature of journalists to dig for the story behind the obvious (read the article) and in the case of religion, they seem to like pitting religion against all of the great unknown quantities in the universe - literally. In recent months, there has been a focus on religion and politics, and not long ago it was religion and science concerning evolution. Now it seems religion is to go toe-to-toe with E.T.

It seems to me that what many journalists miss about Christianity is that it is more than just a rationalization for things we cannot understand. It is a fundamental framework for understanding and when unable to understand, appreciation of creation.

Pastor John Robinson around 1620 wrote, "That which is commonly called schism ariseth from the conceit of faith or want of love." "We seek enlightenment from others who see further into the matter, for we are always prepared to give way modestly to those who teach better things." (Admonitio ad Lectorem, preface to Robert Parker, De Politeia). Funny that he should have the answers to such curious questions of the future, so long ago.

Robison's sermon to pilgrims leaving for the new world is the inspiration for the hymn entitled We Limit Not the Truth of God by George Rawson (1807-1889).

We limit not the truth of God to our poor reach of mind --
By notions of our day and sect -- crude partial and confined
No, let a new and better hope within our hearts be stirred
For God hath yet more light and truth to break forth from the Word.

Who dares to bind to one's own sense the oracles of heaven
For all the nations, tongues, and climes and all the ages given?
That universe, how much unknown! that ocean unexplored
For God hath yet more light and truth to break forth from the Word.

Eternal God, Incarnate Word, Spirit of flame and dove,
enlarge expand all living souls to comprehend your love;
and help us all to seek your will with wiser powers conferred
O God, grant yet more light and truth to break forth from the Word.

************

Christian Theologians Prepare for Extraterrestrial Life

By Brandon Keim 10 hours ago

Little green men might shock the secular public. But the Catholic Church would welcome them as brothers.

(http://www.wired.com/print/science/space/news/2008/06/alien_religion#)

That's what Vatican chief astronomer and papal science adviser Gabriel Funes explained in a recent article in L'Osservatore Romano, the newsletter of the Vatican Observatory (translated here). His conclusion might surprise nonbelievers. After all, isn't this the same church that imprisoned Galileo for saying that the Earth revolves around the sun? Doesn't the Bible say that God created man -- not little green men -- in his image?

Indeed, many observers assert that aliens would be bad for believers. Jill Tarter, director of the Center for SETI Research, once wrote that finding intelligent other-worldly life "will be inconsistent with the existence of God or at least organized religions." But such predictions tend to come from outside Christianity. From within, theologians have debated the implications of alien contact for centuries. And if one already believes in angels, no great leap of faith is required to accept the possibility of other extraterrestrial intelligences.

Since God created the universe, theologians say, he would have created aliens, too. And far from being weakened by contact, Christianity would adapt. Its doctrines would be interpreted anew, the aliens greeted with open -- and not necessarily Bible-bearing -- arms.

"The main question is, 'Would religion survive this contact?'" said NASA chief historian Steven J. Dick, author of The Biological Universe. "Religion hasn't gone away after Copernican theory, after Darwin. They've found ways to adapt, and they'll find a way if this happens, too," Dick says.

The central conundrum posed to Christianity by alien contact would involve the Incarnation -- the arrival of Jesus Christ as God's representative on Earth, his crucifixion and the absolution of humanity's sins through his forgiveness.

"It would still be true -- but if there are other races and intelligences, then what is the meaning of this visit to our race at that time?" asked Vatican astronomer Guy Consolmagno, who in 2005 penned the booklet Intelligent Life in the Universe?

Some propose that the Earthly incarnation of Jesus some 2,000 years ago redeemed all intelligent creatures, in all places and -- since a space-faring race is likely older than us -- in all times. Others have suggested that Jesus could take multiple forms.

"Just as Jesus is human like you and I, you would find an alien-specific Jesus," said Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary professor Ted Peters.

But Peters and others also say that aliens may not have fallen into sin, instead existing in a state of grace, neither having nor needing Jesus. In that case, missionaries would have no call to convert them.

"Would sin be the same on another planet as we conceive of it here? Would there even be sin, or would God be present to that species in a completely different way?" says Richard Randolph, a Kansas City University ethicist.

All this, however, assumes that humanity not only encounters new forms of life but also understands them. Other intelligences may be incomprehensible to us, thus intensifying another doctrinal question: What does it mean to be made, as the Bible proclaims, in God's image?

Many astrotheologians argue that God's image refers to our spiritual nature, with our physical forms being irrelevant. Not everyone, however, agrees.

"If there are aliens, the Bible specifically does not say that they were created in his image," said Mark Conn, pastor of the Noble Hill Baptist Church in Springfield, Missouri. "God created many other intelligent beings on this planet, and they were not created in His image."

Conn's church recently met to discuss the issues posed by extraterrestrial contact, ultimately deciding that "if they're there, they're there. It doesn't change a whole lot."

Unlike Peters, Conn suggested that missionary work may be required, something the aliens may not welcome -- especially if, as many postulate, they are technologically superior to humanity and do not have religions of their own.

"Maybe they'll say that they used to need religion but have outgrown it. Some people say that would be a great blow to religion, because if an advanced civilization doesn't need it, why do we?" said Douglas Vakoch, director of interstellar message composition at SETI.

"I don't buy it, though. I think religion meets very human needs, and unless extraterrestrials can provide a replacement for it, I don't think religion is going to go away," he continued. "And if there are incredibly advanced civilizations with a belief in God, I don't think Richard Dawkins will start believing."

Of Duty and Integrity

Daily Kos reports that Congressman Dennis Kucinich yesterday offered a resolution to impeach George W. Bush. It was an important effort to document the many charges and concerns that Americans have about the integrity of President George W. Bush. While the resolution itself is unlikely to have much affect on the conduct of the President, it will remain as a record of the legitimate concerns, some under investigation by other means, that warrant attention from Congress and the American people.

Moments like these should be recorded and remembered for their value to future generations of citizens. It is instructive to recall the words and actions of Congressman Henry B. Gonzalez, who in 1991 introduced H520-21, a resolution Impeaching George Herbert Walker Bush, President of the United States, of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Representative Gonzalez considered the introduction of this resolution to be nothing less than his sacred duty to the people of the United States and in support of his oath of office wherein he swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. Gonzalez charged that the President violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution by committing a military force, disproportionately comprised of “poor white, black, and Mexican-American or Hispanic-American” people to war."

Article II charged that the President bribed, intimidated and threatened member states of the U. N. Security Council to support war against Iraq and cited payments, loans, debt forgiveness and threats to withhold aid, as examples of U.S. manipulation of a United Nations process.

Article III charged that the President conspired to war against Iraq employing the use of weapons of mass destruction that would take the lives of tens of thousands of civilians.

Article IV states that the President “embarked on a course of action that systematically eliminated every option for peaceful resolution of the Persian Gulf crisis.”

Finally, Article V charged that the President (George H.W. Bush) “conspired to commit crimes against the peace by leading the United States into aggressive war against Iraq, in violation of article 24 of the U.N. Charter, the Nuremberg Charter, other international instruments and treaties, and the Constitution of the United States.”

Congressman Gonzalez concluded his remarks that day, calling for an opportunity to argue the case before the appropriate committee and in an appropriate manner for the members to decide in their own judgment. He argued that day, as Congressman Kucinich did yesterday, for the rule of law and the preservation of the Constitution of the United States. He argued not out of vanity or for want of power, but for the sake of duty and integrity.